The policymakers should not be tighten the law to restrict peopleinto their marriages as they have liberty to choose whether to remainin a long term relationships with their spouses despite that theinstitution of marriage seems to be under siege.
Trends in divorce
-The current frequencies of divorce in the country and a comparisonof the current and the past trends
-The leading causes of divorce and how they influence the decisionstat people make in their marriages
The legal provisions on divorce
-the state laws that provides for individuals to legally separatewith their partners
-A brief comparison between the number of legally divorced partnersand those who have informally left their partners. The comparisonhelps to conclude whether the favorable legal provisions are theprimary cause as to why people seek a divorce.
-A description of the bureaucracies followed during divorce and theirinfluence of partners’ motivation to seek a divorce.
Why the law should not be tightened around divorce
-Individuals enter a marriage by consent and voluntary will and notthrough a legal requirement.
-The choice to remain single, to be separated or to get divorced is achoice embedded in the inherent rights and the freedoms provided bythe Constitution.
-If individuals freely choose to enter into a marriage, ten theyshould not be compelled to remain in it by the law.
-The legal provisions that surround divorce, therefore, should not inany way become bureaucratic to hinder individuals from getting alegal path outside uncomfortable marriage relationships.
The law should not be tightened around divorce and individuals shouldnot be left to choose whether to stay in a marriage or opt to end it.
Voena, Alessandra."Yours, Mine and Ours: Do Divorce Laws Affect the IntertemporalBehavior of Married Couples?" Available at SSRN 2007575(2013). Print.
The author examines how the laws surrounding divorce affect partners’behavior. According to her, the simplicity and the ubiquitous natureand process of obtaining a divorce significantly affect the householddecision-making process. Household without partners earning higherincomes may consider divorce at a higher rate simply because theprocess is affordable and accessible. The article reiterates thatwhen the law provides for equal sharing of the marital property, mostpartners may look forward to exploiting the chance to walk out oftheir marriages.
The article by Voena supports the idea that the legal environmentthat is devoid of lengthy bureaucracies as well as promoting equalityduring separation is one of the leading causes of individuals seekinglegal separation from their partners. The author shares similarsentiments with Wolfers in his article, Did Unilateral Divorce LawsRaise Divorce Rates? A Reconciliation and New Results. Wolfers agreethat the unilateral law agreements as amended in the various stateshave increased the rates of divorce. However, limiting them would notbe entirely consistent with other freedoms entitled to the citizens.
The article will be informative to the concept development in thefinal paper since its argument inclines to the idea in the thesisstatement. It will be instrumental when discussing some of the legalfactors that instigate people to seek legal separations by drawingpoints from its discussion on the legal provisions on equal sharingof resources among others.