Universal Health Care can Work in the U.S

UniversalHealth Care can Work in the U.S

Universalhealth care is the health care system which provides proper financialprotection and health care insurance coverage to all citizens in acountry. This is achieved through the involvement of the governmentin the provision of health care cover and financial protection forhealthcare costs.Because of the advantages of the universal health care, thediscussion will prove that universal health care can work in theUnited States.

Themain reason that universal health care system can work is that it isaffordable to the people. It offers an opportunity for people whocannot afford the costly health care the services that they need.This health care system allows the provision of basic health servicesto all citizens. Privateor Employer based coinsurance policies cover the majority of thepopulation. This insurance advocates for the employer to pay themajor insurance and the employee only paying a small deductiblepremium amount. In this regard it is easy to note that such a healthsystem is biased for the obvious reason of employment (Oslon 21). Itleaves out the majority of citizens who are not employed, disabled orthe elderly. A universal health care system, thus offers a greatrelief.

Moreover,this health care system spreads around the cost of health care to theentire population (Oslo 25). This makes it possible to allow everyoneto at least get basic health care. Cost is a long standing barrierfor everyone accessing health care. Thus, by eliminating it by a wayof spreading it across all populations will highly improve the healthcare system and make universal health care an achievable objective.Hence all citizens would be able to access all basic services such ashospital, long-term care and physician care. The system would befully operated by the government that will set all health care feesfor all citizens, regardless of age, employment status or the levelof income.

Anotherargument why universal health care can work in the United States isbecause it will be affordable to all. The scheme will work throughthe government paying for health services in full or throughsubsidized prices. This will be achieved because of the governmentinvolvement in the health care of the citizens. In the universalhealth care system, the government participates financially in thehealth care of its citizens. Currently health care in the UnitedStates is based on insurance coverage (Sherrow 5). Private orEmployer based coinsurance policies cover the majority of thepopulation. This insurance advocates for the employer to pay themajor insurance and the employee only paying a small deductiblepremium amount. In this regard it is easy to note that such a healthsystem is biased for the obvious reason of employment.

Universalhealth care can work in the United States because it will promote aninclusive health care and involve all the people in the UnitedStates. In the past, the majority of citizens has been left out ofhealth care insurance covers, especially the employed, disabled orthe elderly people (Sherrow 8). Public Insurance programs have beenimplemented by the government to offset this setback, especiallyunder the social amendment act of 1965. Despite this effort, Americahas a population estimated to be 40.3 million citizens who are notmedically insured. These are mainly the adult population who do notqualify for the government programs yet their employers refuse tocover their insurance policies. As a result the costs areunimaginable and sometimes unattainable for the reason being thatuninsured health services are typically very expensive.

Inaddition, introducing a universal health care will allow many peopleto seek medical care without the fear of cost. This is importantbecause health care will reduce the spread of infectious diseasesthat would otherwise be spread and transmitted to a larger population(Oslon 30). The main reasons why infectious diseases are spread isthe affordability of the health care systems. This often results toother negative impacts such as sick and weak citizens that eventuallybecome unproductive. Further than that, universal health care isimportant because more people will be willing to go for medicalcheckups and as a result attack common health problems that areotherwise ignored. This will help to in preventing fatal diseasesfrom developing that usually lead to death.

Auniversal health care system will provide an organized healthyworking environment for the health workers. This is because doctorsand other health practitioners will be able to offer their utmostattention to their patients without external distractions. It iscommon that many health insurance companies are normally unwilling topay. This creates a lot of time wastage in the working environmentwhere doctors fear certain health policies of patients by certaininsurance companies (Oslon 35). In this regard it is important tonote that having a single paying entity will make things easier inthe health sector.

Argumentsagainst

Ithas been argued that this type of system will result to long waitingtimes for patients. Everyone might not even receive the right kind oftreatment or care needed because of the overwhelming demand.Moreover, there is increased probability of bureaucracy because it isa government led program that will result to poor health care (Barrow6). This probability might be strengthened further if the country orstate is already too poor and does not have enough revenues to carefor its people.

Anotherargument is that universal health care is expensive because it raisesthe level of taxes (Barrow 3). This might be true when some manypeople start abusing the benefit of visiting health care centers orhospitals for the mere fact that there are free services available.Such people might seek to care for some conditions that do notactually need any medical attention. As a result, hospitals or healthcare centers tax the system and thus increasing the tax burden. Thisis because the system needs to be paid for to operate. The overallcost of the health system may as a result end up to be financiallydraining to the government and may cause the government to incurlarge unnecessary debts.

Thereis a generally assumption that government is often not very competentin running large systems (Barrow 9). The fact the government will berunning the health sector, it may compromise the quality of servicesoffered. Because of the vast population the government will be forcedto dig in deeper to cover every population. In this regard, it may beforced to cut on other essential areas when seeking to compensate thedemanding health sector. This will often result to weakening orineffectiveness of the areas that might be ripped off.

Counter-arguments

Theargument that universal health care is expensive is not rationalbecause the government can introduce specific programs that run handin hand with the universal care program. These programs will be aimedto monitor, evaluate and review the universal health care systemperiodically to avert the possibilities of having long and poorservice delivery systems (Altman15).More care centers may also be established to ease congestion andemploy more health practitioners to help ease the congestions. Thegovernment may achieve this by training and introducing attractivepackage benefits to the health workers, with the aim of attractingmore workers and also reducing the levels of bureaucracies.

Theargument that universal health care may not be quality is notrational because the government can study other successful countriesto learn. The government can learn from countries like Germany,Canada, Britain and the United States will learn that universalhealth can be realized without necessarily letting the costs go outof hand. In addition, civil education can be used to equip thegeneral population on health practices and reduce the number of casesin hospitals (Altman11). Instilling public trust in government led programs may beachieved by introducing other government entities that will help thegovernment to manage the vast system. This will enable duties andresponsibilities to be divided or delegated amongst such governmententities for an effective outcome.

Conclusion

UnitedStates should really critically consider the benefits of universalhealth care in the country and other countries that have embraced theuniversal health care system. It should be noted that the overallhealth care system increases access to health care to all itscitizens and also reduce the overall healthcare costs. Unlikearguments against universal health care, the government can providequality and affordable healthcare by studying other successfulimplementations of the same in other countries. The citizens shouldperhaps get past the current employer mandate insurance and theuniversal entitlement to discover the actual benefits. Therefore,universalhealth care can work in the United States.

WorksCited

PaulOslon. MoralsArguments for Universal Health Care.Author House, 2012. Print.

VictoriaSherrow. UniversalHealth care: What the United States can learn from Canada.New press, 2009. Print

StuartAltman. Power,Politics and Universal Health care.Prometheus Books, 2009. Print

JudithBarrow. UniversalHealth care Problem in the United States of America.Wagner,2010. Print